AI Act: What Changes for Accountants and Consultants
A practical guide to EU Regulation 2024/1689 for professional firms. Obligations, deadlines and how to prepare.
Caricamento...
Art. 50 of the AI Act and national implementing laws require you to inform clients about AI use. Here is a commented template ready to adapt for your firm.
Transparency about AI use has become a regulatory obligation — not a courtesy or a differentiating element, but a minimum requirement for compliant operation. With the AI Act fully applicable to deployers and national implementing laws in force across EU member states, every professional who uses AI in managing client matters has an obligation to inform them.
This article explains what the regulation requires, where the disclosure should be inserted, and provides a ready-to-adapt template.
Art. 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act) establishes transparency obligations for two categories. Note: Art. 50 will be fully applicable from 2 August 2026 (Art. 113 AI Act). However, for Italian professionals, the client disclosure obligation is already in force since 10 October 2025 under Art. 13 of Law 132/2025.
1. AI systems that interact with natural persons: those who deploy AI systems designed to interact directly with people (chatbots, voice assistants, automated response systems) must inform their interlocutor that they are interacting with an AI — except in cases where this is obvious from the context.
2. Content generated or manipulated by AI: those who use AI to generate or manipulate content (texts, images, audio) that can reasonably mislead as to authenticity must mark such content as AI-generated.
For an accountant, a lawyer or an HR consultant, the practical application of Art. 50 concerns above all the second category: documents, opinions, reports, analyses drafted with AI support that are delivered to clients.
Art. 50 does not prohibit the use of AI. It requires that the use be transparent.
National laws implementing the AI Act across EU member states go further on one specific point: the written disclosure obligation for professionals.
National implementing provisions typically require regulated professionals and those carrying out regulated or de facto reserved professional activities to:
The disclosure obligation applies from the moment AI is used on the client's matter — not from the signature of the contract. For clients with ongoing engagements at the point national laws came into force, the disclosure should be provided retroactively as soon as possible.
The text below is a complete model, already structured to comply with the requirements of both levels of regulation. Fields in square brackets must be replaced with the firm's specific details.
Dear [CLIENT NAME],
We are writing to inform you that in carrying out the services provided for under our professional engagement, [FIRM NAME] uses artificial intelligence (AI) tools for [ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION: e.g. "drafting document templates", "analysis of regulatory data", "regulatory and case-law research"].
The AI tools currently in use are: [LIST OF TOOLS: e.g. Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT Enterprise, Kira Systems]. These tools are selected on the basis of their compliance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) and have adequate data processing agreements in place.
Every output generated by AI systems is subject to review and oversight by a qualified professional of the Firm, who assumes full professional responsibility in accordance with the ethical rules of [RELEVANT PROFESSIONAL BODY]. The use of AI supports professional activity without replacing it.
You have the right to request at any time specific information on the use of AI in your matter, including: the systems employed, the activities for which they are used, and the manner of human review. Such information is provided within 10 working days of written request. You also have the right to object to the use of AI on your personal data, within the limits permitted by applicable law and compatible with the Firm's operational methods.
Documentation relating to the use of AI is retained for a period of [5] years as a matter of professional best practice and in line with the firm's general document retention policy.
For any queries or requests, please contact us at [EMAIL] or on [TELEPHONE].
Yours sincerely, [FIRM NAME AND SIGNATURE] [DATE]
There are three methods of delivery, each with different characteristics:
Option A — Integrated in the engagement letter (recommended) The disclosure is included as a specific article in the engagement letter, before the liability section. The client receives it, reads it and signs it along with the rest of the contract. This is the most defensible form: the client has explicitly accepted the document that contains the disclosure.
Option B — Separate attachment to the engagement letter The disclosure is attached as a separate document ("Annex A — AI Disclosure") that the client signs separately. Useful if the standard engagement letter cannot be modified in the short term.
Option C — Standalone email for existing clients For clients with already-ongoing engagements, email is the quickest solution. Evidence of sending must be retained and, if possible, confirmation of receipt obtained. A simple "Received and noted" from the client is sufficient.
Timing: the disclosure must precede the start of AI use on the client's matter — it cannot be provided retrospectively as a formal obligation.
Form: written — paper or digital. Email is explicitly accepted by the regulations, provided it is retained.
Evidence of delivery: always retain evidence of delivery. Practical options:
These are the most common mistakes that make the disclosure ineffective or non-compliant:
If your firm already uses AI tools — even just Copilot in emails or ChatGPT for drafts — the disclosure is already due. The immediate practical step is:
In our guides collection you will find the complete AI disclosure template, already formatted in Word and PDF, with variants for accountants, lawyers and HR consultants — ready to adapt in 15 minutes.
Download the free template — Explore the AI Act Ready service
For a complete understanding of the regulation that makes this disclosure mandatory — including deadlines, risk categories and the full scope of deployer obligations — read our AI Act guide.
Yes, if the professional uses AI systems that interact with or produce outputs relating to clients. This includes: using AI to draft documents, analyse client data, generate opinions or recommendations. It is not required for purely internal and generic use (e.g. AI to update one's own knowledge) where client data is not involved.
The disclosure should be delivered before the start of the service — ideally at the time of signing the engagement letter. For already-active clients, it should be delivered as soon as AI starts being used on their matters, or in any case within the timeframes established by the national implementing legislation in force. Delivery can be in written form, paper or digital.
Yes, email delivery is acceptable provided the professional retains evidence of sending (delivery receipt, read receipt, or simply a copy of the sent email with timestamp). It is advisable to use an email with a read-receipt request, or to ask the client to reply with a brief confirmation of receipt.
Ogni settimana: guide pratiche, novità normative e casi d'uso per studi professionali. Niente spam.
A practical guide to EU Regulation 2024/1689 for professional firms. Obligations, deadlines and how to prepare.
A practical checklist with the 15 key AI Act obligations for professional firms. From AI tool inventory to documented training, internal policy and client disclosure.
What the AI literacy obligation requires, who it applies to, what penalties risk non-compliance, and how to fulfil it before the deadline.